0.00/0.05 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.1Q05fbjCN3 true 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 1440 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 180 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 13:36:19 UTC 2026 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.43 % Running portfolio for 1440 s 0.17/0.43 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.17/0.43 % Number of cores: 8 0.17/0.43 % Python version: Python 3.12.3 0.17/0.44 % Running in HO mode 0.37/0.83 % Total configuration time : 828 0.37/0.83 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.37/0.83 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.39/0.92 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.39/1.02 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.39/1.02 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.39/1.03 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.39/1.03 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.39/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.39/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.39/1.04 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 30.23/4.70 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 30.23/4.70 % done 19 iterations in 3.631s 30.23/4.70 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 30.23/4.70 % SZS output start Refutation 30.23/4.70 thf(a_type, type, a: $tType). 30.23/4.70 thf(cTHM535, conjecture, 30.23/4.70 (( ![Xs:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( Xs @ X ) => ( ?[Xt:( a > $o )]: ( X @ Xt ) ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xf:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > a > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: ( ( Xs @ X ) => ( X @ ( Xf @ X ) ) ) ) ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ![A:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ X ) => ( ?[Xu:( a > $o )]: ( X @ Xu ) ) ) ) & 30.23/4.70 ( ?[X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: ( A @ X ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ( ^[Xx:a]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![Xa:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ Xa ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xb:( a > $o )]: ( ( Xa @ Xb ) & ( Xb @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) = 30.23/4.70 ( ^[Xx:a]: 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xf:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > a > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![Xa:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ Xa ) => ( ( Xa @ ( Xf @ Xa ) ) & ( Xf @ Xa @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 30.23/4.70 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, 30.23/4.70 (~( ( ![Xs:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( Xs @ X ) => ( ?[Xt:( a > $o )]: ( X @ Xt ) ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xf:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > a > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: ( ( Xs @ X ) => ( X @ ( Xf @ X ) ) ) ) ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ![A:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( ( ![X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ X ) => ( ?[Xu:( a > $o )]: ( X @ Xu ) ) ) ) & 30.23/4.70 ( ?[X:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: ( A @ X ) ) ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ( ^[Xx:a]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![Xa:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ Xa ) => 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xb:( a > $o )]: ( ( Xa @ Xb ) & ( Xb @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) = 30.23/4.70 ( ^[Xx:a]: 30.23/4.70 ( ?[Xf:( ( ( a > $o ) > $o ) > a > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ![Xa:( ( a > $o ) > $o )]: 30.23/4.70 ( ( A @ Xa ) => ( ( Xa @ ( Xf @ Xa ) ) & ( Xf @ Xa @ Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 30.23/4.70 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cTHM535])). 30.23/4.70 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 30.23/4.70 (~ (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : ((a > $o) > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : (a > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y0 @ Y1) => 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y2 : a > $o]: (Y1 @ Y2))))))))) => 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : ((a > $o) > $o) > a > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : (a > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y0 @ Y2) => (Y2 @ 30.23/4.70 (Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))))) => 30.23/4.70 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : ((a > $o) > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : (a > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y0 @ Y1) => 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y2 : a > $o]: (Y1 @ Y2))))))))) & 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y1 : (a > $o) > $o]: (Y0 @ Y1)))))) => 30.23/4.70 ((((^[Y1 : a]: 30.23/4.70 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : (a > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y0 @ Y2) => 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y3 : a > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y2 @ Y3) & (Y3 @ 30.23/4.70 Y1))))))))))))) = 30.23/4.70 ((^[Y1 : a]: 30.23/4.70 (((??) @ (^[Y2 : ((a > $o) > $o) > a > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : (a > $o) > $o]: 30.23/4.70 (((Y0 @ Y3) => 30.23/4.70 (((Y3 @ (Y2 @ Y3)) & 30.23/4.70 (Y2 @ Y3 @ Y1))))))))))))))))))))))), 30.23/4.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 30.23/4.70 thf(zip_derived_cl609, plain, ($false), 30.23/4.70 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])). 30.23/4.70 30.23/4.70 % SZS output end Refutation 30.23/4.70 30.23/4.70 30.23/4.70 % Terminating... 31.05/4.76 % Runner terminated. 31.05/4.80 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 31.05/4.81 EOF